Developers and gamers are all boarding the Web3 train, it has become the latest trend in the gaming industry. More and more investors are turning their heads towards the latest technology in gaming. One of the fundamental decisions that a developer needs to make in blockchain game development is choosing the right blockchain platform. No matter what kind of game you are curating, whether an NFT-based, a play-to-earn, or even a decentralized metaverse, selecting the right blockchain platform is essential for the success of your game.
There are an n number of blockchain platforms, however, three of the most celebrated ones are Polygon, Ethereum, and Solana. They have distinct properties and work best depending on the project. Therefore, you can pick the best one for your project as we compare them in detail in this blog.
Blockchain platform matters a lot in blockchain game development as it has an influence on a lot of things. How will the game perform, and will it be scalable, and what would be the cost of transaction for users are some of the areas directly proportional to the blockchain platform. A list of factors that are influenced by blockchain choice is given below.
Before finalizing a blockchain platform, you must consider some of the key factors listed below. Based on these factors, you can easily choose the best blockchain for your game.
You need to ask one of the important questions: can users afford frequent in-game transactions? If the gas fee is high, not many users would interact frequently with the game. Especially when the P2E and NFT-trading mechanics are involved, low transaction costs determine the traffic of the game.
Another question that should be answered is whether the game will be able to support thousands of players simultaneously or not? The issue of scalability, also known as transaction speed, arises when the game encounters a lot of players simultaneously, resulting in lag. Therefore, ensure the platform provides high scalability if your game requires a myriad of concurrent players.
Some blockchain platforms are niche, and it is hard to find developers well-versed with those platforms. Hence, you need to find out whether it is easy to hire developers or access documentation around the platform or not. A rich ecosystem will improve your chances of finding a talent familiar with the chain.
If the blockchain has a large and active community, the chances of the market adopting the game increase. You need to check whether the blockchain is widely used by gamers and investors or not.
A blockchain platform should be stable and secure to avoid downtimes. If the network is prone to congestion or downtime, the user experience gets affected badly.
| Feature | Ethereum | Polygon | Solana |
| Gas Fees | Very high (up to $10–$50 per transaction) | Very low ($0.001–$0.05), ideal for microtransactions | Ultra-low (fractions of a cent) |
| Speed (Transactions/Second) | ~30 TPS (very limited without Layer 2) | 65,000+ TPS (Layer-2 scaling) | ~65,000 TPS (natively scalable) |
| Security | Extremely secure and decentralized (most tested blockchain) | Inherits Ethereum’s security; secure with slight centralization | Secure but has faced multiple high-profile outages |
| Developer Ecosystem | Massive, long-established ecosystem (Solidity, tools, devs) | Ethereum-compatible, low learning curve (Solidity, Hardhat, Truffle) | Smaller, but growing. Uses Rust or C — steeper learning curve |
| Tooling & SDKs | Very mature – Truffle, Hardhat, Alchemy, Infura | Same tools as Ethereum + dedicated Polygon SDK | Phantom, Solana SDKs, Anchor framework |
| Popular Games | Axie Infinity (initially), Decentraland, The Sandbox | Aavegotchi, Sunflower Land, Revv Racing | Star Atlas, Aurory, Genopets |
| User Wallets | MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet | MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Polygon Wallet Suite | Phantom, Solflare |
| Launch & Maintenance Cost | Expensive to deploy and maintain | Affordable to launch and scale | Low-cost deployment |
| Ideal Use Cases | Complex, high-value games with deep economies and long lifespans | Scalable indie games, NFT collectibles, P2E experiences | Real-time games, action/MMO games with high speed requirements |
| Network Uptime | Extremely reliable | Very stable | Occasional outages and congestion reported |
| Interoperability | High (many dApps, bridges, NFT support) | High (EVM-compatible, integrates with Ethereum projects) | Moderate (somewhat isolated ecosystem, growing bridge support) |
In this section, we will define the pros and cons of each of the leading blockchain platforms.
Pros:
Also Read: Smart Contracts in Blockchain Games: The Game-Changing Technology
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Also Read: Solana NFT Marketplace Development- An Exclusive Guide
Depending on your project’s nature, we would suggest the right blockchain for you. Different blockchains can be suitable for different projects; a gist of the same shall be discussed below.
If you are developing a AAA game and using blockchain technology to incorporate future trends, Ethereum would be the right platform for you. While developing a high-asset value game, you need to prioritize the security of the game. The best security you can get is through Ethereum. It can easily handle complex in-game economies, the only downside is its high gas fees.
If you are an indie developer or own a game development startup, Polygon can be the best blockchain platform for your next NFT game. Polygon can provide EVM compatibility, which would replicate the security of the Ethereum platform, with a significantly lower cost. You get a balanced performance, fees, and security from this platform.
Lastly, if you are developing real-time games, fast-paced multiplayer action, and projects that require speed and low gas fees, Solana is your go-to choice. Works best for games developed for mobile phones.
Without the right blockchain platform, developing a blockchain-based game can become a mess. Hence, it is critical for developers to choose the right blockchain. It doesn’t matter what genre of game you are developing, be it a metaverse or a fast-paced action game, platforms like Ethereum, Polygon, and Solana offer solutions that help in refining your blockchain game.
From the blog, we have understood that Ethereum is the most premium of the three blockchains; therefore, the most expensive as well. Polygon has the middle ground between Ethereum and Solana, it offers balance, flexibility, and low gas fees. Lastly, Solana has speed and offers cheap transaction fees, but it cannot be trusted like Ethereum and has encountered downtime several times.
You can also contact a blockchain game development company to understand which blockchain platform will best suit your game.
Ans. It depends on your game’s needs. Although Ethereum is ideal for security-focused projects, it is expensive. Polygon offers scalability with low fees, and Solana is best for fast, real-time multiplayer games. Hence, depending upon the nature of your project, you can opt for any of the three chains.
Ans. Ethereum is efficient, highly secure, but comes with a price tag. Polygon offers EVM compatibility and low fees. Solana provides high-speed transactions with minimal costs, great for action-based Web3 games.
Ans. Polygon combines Ethereum’s developer ecosystem, i.e., EVM compatibility, with high scalability and very low gas fees. This feature makes it a top choice for NFT games and play-to-earn experiences.
Ans. Yes, Solana is excellent for real-time, fast-paced games due to its high transaction speed and low latency, though developers must use Rust and handle occasional network issues.
Ans. Yes, you can switch blockchains after launching a game. However, it is not feasible and is a complex process. Therefore, it’s crucial to choose the right platform before development begins.
